NSRC: National Sexuality Resource Center

A fabulous Halloween?

Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 01:25:07pm   ►by Richard C Garcia   ►

    With Halloween right around the corner, I’d been seeing a video made by the satirical news source, The Onion, circulate widely on facebook. The video discusses how to find a masculine Halloween costume for your effeminate son. To start with, I promise that I get that this is a joke, I know that. Part of me thinks the video is hilarious, but part of me cringes when I watch it. Another side of me laughs at the part that’s cringing, and yet another cringes at the part of me laughing. Grad school warps your sense of humor in new and suprising ways. Anyway, the video highlights ways to quote “hide your effeminate son” with masculine costumes. Does your son prance around too much? Put him in a robot outfit that restricts movement and hides his high voice with robot sounds! Long lashes and curly hair? Prevent him from twirling his locks, and blinking visibly, with an animal suit that covers him head to toe! Is a vampire the right choice, after all, they are flashy dressers? Yes, of course it is! They dress like that to seduce women.

     

    In watching this video, several messages are being conveyed. For example, whether or not someone is going to take this seriously, it’s clear that feminine boys are something you should hide/change. Also, the feminine boy might be gay, so an attraction to women should be made explicit to counteract the possibility. The video concludes with a message to parents about their ‘faggy acting’ child. All in all, what’s going on here is an assault on gender nonconformity. I worry that the video is funny because many of us know individuals that would actually consider measures to make their feminine sons more masculine. If that’s the case, how much of this is fueling the idea that heteromasculine boys should be the norm, and how much is it a chance to laugh at people who would hold such backward views?

     

    To say that the language, layers, and issues the video present are complex is an understatement. With that in mind though, I find myself pausing, watching, laughing, and thinking, as well as reflecting back on my own childhood in ways that are not pleasant. This Halloween, I wonder what parents consider to be acceptable costumes for their children, and for those of us deciding on our own costumes, what are we ‘allowed’ to be? Do we challenge stereotypes by invoking them? Do we avoid the often racist and sexist costumes that usually crowd the store, think 'ninjas' and sexy law enforcement?  Do we use this night to be something we only usually dream of? Whatever I end up doing, I’ll likely think back to my parents dressing my brother and me up as pumpkins. Vegetables seem much less threatening for some reason.

     

    Comments

    I'm a neurotic grad student too!

    I was torn while watching between being offended, questioning whether I should be offended, laughing, and questioning whether I should be laughing. I find that it's easier to decide when I know the tone and underlying ideology. If this was a jab at parents' obsession with forcing their kids to conform into rigid gender expectations, I'd be at ease and could let out a hardy guffaw. If I knew that this wasn't a progressive, socially conscious, queer or queer-friendly site, I'd be offended and be ready to tear it to pieces. But, I don't know the Onion well enough. And, even when we do know one way or another, there are still uninformed views that sometimes surface. (Need I mention the example of well-intentioned white liberals that fall into the huge trap of ill-informed racial stereotypes, or what have you. Same goes for men with gender, heterosexuals with sexuality, and so forth.)

    Eric Anthony Grollman on Nov 01, 2009 01:09pm

    what is says or what it does?

    There's a part of me that takes slight offense by this as well, but generally I've gotta laugh at the parody of gendered 'realities' presented by comical outlets such as this video clip. I prefer to read these kind of 'texts' rather in the form of what the do rather than what they actually say in content. While I believe the content does read uniformly to your analysis, Richard, I believe that the performance of the piece highlights the ridiculous nature of parental anxieties about the gendered performances of their children. I also have to laugh at the comedic anxiety of certain forms of masculinity being 'co-opted' by the gay community presented in the first example.

    Michael McNamara on Nov 02, 2009 01:56pm

    Add a comment


    CAPTCHA

    This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

    Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.